Just War Theory (Readings in Social and Political Theory)

by Jean Elshtain

Publisher: NYU Press

Written in English
Cover of: Just War Theory (Readings in Social and Political Theory) | Jean Elshtain
Published: Pages: 336 Downloads: 142
Share This

Subjects:

  • Political science & theory,
  • Political Philosophy,
  • Politics - Current Events,
  • Politics / Current Events,
  • Politics/International Relations,
  • General,
  • Just war doctrine
The Physical Object
FormatHardcover
Number of Pages336
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL8044857M
ISBN 100814721869
ISBN 109780814721865

Just War Theory (Readings in Social and Political Theory) by Jean Elshtain Download PDF EPUB FB2

Originally published inin the wake of the first war against Iraq, Just War Theory explores this essential dilemma. With a new preface by the editor, the essays in this indispensable collection move beyond the theoretical origins of just war theory to examine issues faced by military strategists, politicians, social theorists, and anyone Format: Paperback.

Just War is a concept that governs the conditions under which a war can be waged and how it can be waged. Increasingly, it also handles the post-war issues of legal claims about war crimes committed previously. The theory of Just War is known in variant forms since antiquity and several versions exist within both religious and philosophical.

Just War Theory has a long history in the western intellectual tradition. Augustine commented on the morality of war from a Christian perspective, as did several Arabic commentators from the 9th to the 12th centuries. But St. Thomas Aquinas provided the most celebrated and still discussed the main outlines of just war theory.

Just War Theory traditionally has two sets of criteria. “Just war theory today is a composite that has evolved from ideas developed by various religious figures. In the 5th century, St. Augustine discussed in the City of God the circumstances under which killing could be justified, and empires legitimately.

Get this from a library. Just war theory. [Jean Bethke Elshtain;] -- "Long before the 'shock and awe' campaign against Iraq in Marchdebates swarmed around the justifications of the U.S.-led war to depose Saddam Hussein. While George W. Bush's administration. Cicero, in De Officiis, Book 1, argued justifying reasons for war.

It is the great Church father, St. Augustine, Bishop of Hippo who is given credit for developing the foundation for just war theory and its first three principles: just cause; legitimate authority; right. Just War Theory raises some of the most pressing and important philosophical issues of our day.

This book brings together some of the most important essays in this area written by leading scholars and offering significant contributions to how we understand just war theory. Our war, the Vietnam War, was not just for many reasons. First of all, there was not a just cause or reason for the United States (us) to get involved in the war.

The only reason we went to war with the North Vietnamese was to prevent Communism from spreading to South Vietnam, which wouldn't have affected our country. So, at the beginning of the process, it seemed best to focus on some very basic questions: the very idea of “Catholic international relations theory”; the current state of the just war debate in the Church; and the nature, prospects and limits of international law.

[We need] many diverse voices contributing to the just war tradition itself, which is something this collection ably provides."—Journal of Church and State "A unique contribution to the mass of just-war literature a book for the specialist and those well-versed in just war theory."—Laurence M.

Vance, Just war theory is typically considered to be an essential rights-based or deontological theory. Yet, as we have defined it here -- as the attempt to distinguish between ethical justifiable and unjustifiable uses of organized armed forces -- one might take a utilitarian approach to just war theory instead.

The Evolution of the Theory. The origin of just war theory is usually traced to the writings of Augustine, though many of the theory’s elements became well established only much later, during its “classical” period between the early 16 th and mid th centuries.

The principles of just war theory were then understood to be part of a. Theory. The Just War tradition is, first of all, a set of criteria that act as an aid to determining whether or not resorting to arms is the morally correct step.

Just War theory promotes the view that war is "just" (in accordance with the interests of justice), given satisfactory "conditions" tend to be variable, open to interpretation, and otherwise subject to political.

Despite the millennial hopes for peace wishfully harboured by so many, the opening years of the twenty-first century have seen the morality of war remain urgently central to political argument around the just war tradition has provided one of the most beguiling frameworks for the question of when it is right to go to war, and how war ought to be conducted.

Institutionalizing the Just War offers a new approach to thinking about the ethics of large-scale armed conflict. Allen Buchanan takes a unique approach to just war theory, arguing that theories that are content with articulating abstract moral norms specifying right acts of war-making, provide too little guidance for responding to the real world moral problems of war.

just war theory, and then a positive argument for Kant’s general philosophical approach and a new category of just war theory, I offer an interpretation of Kant on just war theory. I argue this interpretation is superior to previous ones, and recommends real world applications for just war theorists to : Steven Charles Starke.

The authors speak from a just-war moral perspective to provide Christians with expert and accessible answers to more than one hundred common questions concerning the ethics of issues of war and peace at the forefront of current events, an informed Christian response is needed.

This timely volume, War, Peace, and Christianity: Questions and Answers from a Just War Perspective answers Brand: Crossway. Get this from a library. Gender, justice, and the wars in Iraq: a feminist reformulation of just war theory.

[Laura Sjoberg] -- "Gender, Justice, and the Wars in Iraq offers a feminist critique and reconstruction of just war theory.

It points out gender biases in the just war tradition and suggests alternative jus ad. Just War Theory raises some of the most pressing and important philosophical issues of our day. This book brings together some of the most important essays in this area written by leading scholars and offering significant contributions to how we understand just war theory.

Just War Theory is a local theory. It deals not with ethics as a whole, but with a small cluster of ethical issues. As a result the theory does not satisfy many of the criteria (of Chapter 2) that theories are supposed to possess. The question arises then: is JWT really a theory.

And if it is, must we meaningfully question some of the Chapter 2 criteria?Author: Nick Fotion. The Just War theory specifies conditions for judging if it is just to go to war, and conditions for how the war should be fought.

Although it was extensively developed by Christian theologians, it. This book will be of great interest to students of just war theory, war and ethics, peace and conflict studies, philosophy and security studies. Table of Contents Introduction: Not Just Wars: Expansions and Alternatives to the Just War Tradition Fritz Allhoff, Nicholas G.

Evans and Adam Henschke Part I: Theories of War: Revisiting the Just War. This book addresses the criticisms and explores new angles to just war thinking, analysing its practical adequacy in the face of modern-day realities.

It is written with the aim of stimulating debate, recasting or revivifying critical reservations, but also powerfully demonstrating how just war theory cannot be ignored if we take seriously the. Social & Political Philosophy The Ethics of War and Peace—1 I will provide here a couple of summaries of just war theory.

The first is from An Encyclopedia of War and Ethics and the second is an online source from the Stanford Encyclopedia of ardsFile Size: KB.

But if just war theory implies that the same person both may and may not intentionally kill other human beings – which is a contradiction – then it is rationally untenable. The word ‘war’ is used today to denote practices which would not be recognized by the fathers of just war theory.

The questions of pacifism, the just war theory, and war itself are very personal for me. Over 33 years ago, I was honorably discharged from the U.S.

Army as a conscientious objector. Just war theory has ancient roots. The so-called Song of Deborah in the 5th chapter of the Hebrew Bible 's Book of Judges discusses late bronze age conceptions of what distinguishes a "just" holy war.

Just War Theory is based on this classical view and from it the central concepts derive: that of the prior guilt of the offending party; and of just war as a means of vindicating violated rights or a violated order of justice, or as the means of restoring justice.